I often remark to my students, or
at least I did when I could see them, that in any given subject there is one,
or possibly a few, works that anyone in the field has to read. As subjects
develop, someone writes the definitive study of the field up to that point, and
everyone else moves from there to new stuff.
In the field of Anglo-Saxon
studies, and indeed the early Norman era, the granddaddy of all studies is this
one:
Stenton, F., Anglo-Saxon England
(Oxford: Clarendon, 1971).
The above is the third edition of
the volume in the Oxford History of England, and it does what it says on the
tin. In over 700 pages we move from the vague ideas of whatever was going on
after the end of Roman rule in England to the consolidation of Norman rule
after Hastings.
Of course, Stenton (or ‘Sir Frank’)
only takes the story so far. There has been a fair bit of development and
research in the period since he died in 1967. The book was, in fact, finished
off by his wife Doris, who was a scholar of Anglo-Saxon England in her own
right. Nevertheless, if you read the footnotes and bibliographies of other
scholarly works you will find Stenton there: he is unavoidable.
In that case, of course, he
should have been the first author whom I read, instead of coming towards the
middle of the pack. There were two reasons for this. Firstly, he was not the
first to be delivered. The book being out of print meant that delivery was
subject to the vagaries of Royal Mail which, in our neck of the woods, is a
little hit and miss on the timing. Secondly, I admit that I was rather put off
by the idea of reading seven hundred pages of a work, not all of which was
necessarily relevant to my actual interest, the consequences of the Harrying of
the North.
Once I set out to read the tome,
I discovered how useful it was, and why it has stood the test of time so well.
As with many scholars whose positions were not dependent on multiple
publications in high impact journals, but who were just left to get on with
producing high-quality scholarship, Stenton is comprehensive and judicious. He
does not make particularly wild claims about things, and he does try very hard
not to go beyond the evidence as he knew it. When he speculates, he does so
explicitly, not as some wild claim in a publication to jack up his score for
the looming Research Evaluation Exercise, or whatever it is to be called next
time.
Stenton is comprehensive. If you
want to know what sake and soke is, then the explanation is in here. If you want
to know why Kent is different from the rest of the country, the basis of it is
here as well. Stenton, according to modern scholarship, perhaps does err a bit.
He does seem to think that William the Conqueror’s route to London can be
tracked by the waste manors in the south in Domesday Book. That is quite
probably not correct, but it was the weight of opinion at the time he wrote.
There is a huge amount of stuff
in these pages. The expansion of the English Church and its European role in
the middle of the period was something I was only vaguely aware of. The
Anglo-Saxon church produced scholars of European states, such as Bede and
Alcuin (who was headhunted by Charlemagne, by the way, an early form of the
brain drain) as well as a large number of evangelists such as Boniface (who
converted the Germans and seems, by popular acclaim anyway, to have invented
the Christmas tree). The impact of the Anglo-Saxon church on European churches
and monasteries should not be underestimated, although the traffic was, of
course, two-way. Several bits of England, after all, needed re-Christianisation
after assorted invasions. In fact, it seems that the Norse in Scandinavia and
those in England were converted at roughly the same time.
As background to what I am
interested in, Stenton is essential, I think. As to the Harrying of the North,
he is not particularly original, reckoning on a great deal of destruction meted
out by the Bastard’s army in the winter of 1069-70. More usefully, he does
place this activity in a wider context of the revolts going on at the time.
Given the restive nature of the English nobility to the conquerors, William
strikes me here as a man in a hurry. By the time he arrived in York, his
attention was going to be required elsewhere. The rebels had already been
forgiven for previous misdeeds (from his perspective, at least) and he could
not, according to the lights of the day, really afford to be nice about things
any more. Medieval warfare included destruction and so destruction was used as
a weapon of war.
One of the interesting themes
that emerge is that England was conquered quickly because of a lack of castles.
The Normans did not make that mistake, of course. There is hardly a part of
England one can go to without bumping one’s nose into a large lump of Norman
masonry. I actually have something to say about the locating of Norman castles,
which is more interesting and complex than might be thought, but I need to do a
bit more digging around and reading before going to press on the subject.
Anyhow, for the off-piste project
(and a non-wargaming subject) Stenton is very interesting, especially as I got
my second hand out of print hardback copy for £5. In terms of wargaming (which
is not the focus here, but once a wargamer, always a wargamer) there is
actually a great deal about military activity, particularly as it relates to
state activities. There are also, especially in the bit between 1066 and 1086 a
large number of possible campaign and battle scenarios, based around potential
Viking invasions and rebellions within England, not exclusively by the newly
oppressed English.
No comments:
Post a Comment