My loyal reader (for there may be
one) might recall that my world wargaming rebasing project seems to have
stalled with the Manchu. In fact, this is not the case, and rebasing of my old,
old figures has been proceeding apace. Well, not quite apace, but with
reasonable alacrity, for me, anyway.
So to start off with, I have done
the Koreans, and already written a blog post about them, so here they are:
You might object that they need
some more firearms, and you would be correct. However, given that the musket
armed unit are pinched from the Chinese anyway, they can gain reinforcements from
either there or the South East Asian, of whom more anon. The figures are Irregular, the army composition DBR. The infantry formation seems to be correct
from the paper I read and reported on a while ago.
Next up, we reach the furthest
east, and more familiar wargame territory, Japan. The Samurai are the sorts of
wargamer’s army that everyone seems to like. Whether it is the different but
similar warrior code, assorted films or who knows what else I have no idea. But
popular they are.
Again the figures here are
irregular; I seem to need some more cavalry. There are enough troops here for
three Samurai DBR armies at 100 AP, and I have fond memories of leading them to
an epic defeat against a mix of Korean, Ming and Manchu foes, where the main
problem was that after the first battle the Samurai had lost their cavalry,
which meant their scouting was negligible and that they had no real answer to the
Korean and Ming cavalry. I didn’t even know the Manchu were on their way until
they appeared on the table of the last battle, where the remnants of the invaders
were already holding out against the odds.
Heading back towards the
Occident, the next encounter is in South East Asia, a surprisingly
under-represented era of wargaming. Full on warfare with colourful armies and
elephants. What more could a wargamer want? All right, there is a bit of a dearth
of information about what actually happened, but when has that stopped any
wargame? The only thing I can say is that, as with India, the use of the
elephant was being reduced as they do not like firearms (sensible creature,
your elephant, really) and it was difficult to train them to tolerate them. Anyway,
Irregular Miniatures again, cobbled together from various ranges.
I have to say I do wonder about
the Burmese elephants (at the back of the elephant column in the picture). Somehow
Irregular has crammed 12 troops onto one platform. I know Burmese nellies are
reported as having up to sixteen crew, but if I were an elephant with that many
people on board, I think I would at least go on strike for more pay, if not
suck up a mix of water and mud (and, possibly, other things, it would depend on
annoyance levels) and spray the humans until they got off.
Next across are the Indians, but
I have already covered them, so moving swiftly on we have an assortment of
Arabians and North Africans. I think this lot should represent more or less any
army from Oman to Morocco, but I do have my doubts. I am also hoping they might
double up as Grenadines for the last stages of the Reconquista but again, I
would have to think about it.
The Taureg are the scary heavy
camels to the left of the picture. The North Africans also have a few
Janissaries as they got garrisons from the Ottomans when they assumed suzerainty.
Again, these are Irregular figures, cobbled together from assorted medieval and
colonial ranges, Fuzzy-Wuzzies in particular, I think.
Being nearly back to the west, we
have to divide into various time streams. It has to be admitted that Western
armies, in wargame terms (if not in overall historiography, although I suspect
it is similar) are allowed to evolve, while non-Western armies are pretty well
static. The truth is, of course, Western armies and societies have been studied
in detail, while the rest have been lumped into one era or another. So, first
up are the Italian Wars, Irregular figures plus some Heroics and Ros.
Here we have extensive numbers of
gendarmes, Swiss pike and crossbowmen, alongside a few other things such as
jinites, stradoit and the odd arquebusier. Some of these had been rebased
before for the Armada campaign, I admit. But who is quibbling?
Hanging around in the Sixteenth Century still, I have some English (bill and bow style units, with Border Horse), some longbows and dismounted knights (H&R figures), demi-lancers and mid-century foot. These tend to be used rather ad-hoc (as the originals were, in fact), and those of you who were interested might have seen some of them in action in the Armada campaign games.
Hanging around in the Sixteenth Century still, I have some English (bill and bow style units, with Border Horse), some longbows and dismounted knights (H&R figures), demi-lancers and mid-century foot. These tend to be used rather ad-hoc (as the originals were, in fact), and those of you who were interested might have seen some of them in action in the Armada campaign games.
Shifting into the Seventeenth Century, we reach what are probably my oldest 6 mm figures, which are Irregular
Miniatures from the mid-1990s, for the English Civil War. The ECW was my first
main focus of wargaming when I was a lad, so when I returned it seemed like the
obvious thing to do.
As the picture shows there are
quite a lot of these. I think I just kept on buying and painting before I moved
out into other parts of the ‘Renaissance’ wargame world. The three rows at the
back on each wing, incidentally, are dragoons, and the rearmost infantry
regiment is from the Irregular ‘restoration’ range, so a tiny bit later. But I’m
all for variety.
For those of you falling asleep
in the parade, I’m nearly done. Next up is the artillery park. I like guns, and
I still have a few more to re-base.
This lot are all Irregular,
except for some Baccus stunt crew members, and stand in for artillery of all
nations and periods. I have some mortars and battalion guns to paint as well,
and a few Heroics and Ros artillery pieces to base up. I doubt if I could ever
deploy this lot all at once, however, and artillery were not the most useful
part of a field army.
Finally, we have the Scots, so we
are now at another extremity of the world. These are a bit more of a work in
progress, having been painted and rebased for the Armada campaign. I am aware
of the lack of musketeers for the ECW period, and also that not all Scottish
cavalry were lancers. The highlanders are a mix of Baccus and Irregular, the
rest are Baccus, but not the latest style releases. You can’t have (or paint)
everything.
Now, in case you were thinking
that that was everything, my former self was more industrious that you might believe
(or I can, either). There are still hordes of Aztecs and their foes and Inca in
my drawers (ooh, er, missus), and War of Spanish Succession and Great Northern
Wars in a box. The latter are a bit muddled up, so will require some sorting. I
also have some more ships and a load of Renaissance galleys which will need
sorting, rebasing and repairing.
A wargamer’s work is never done,
but now I think I would like to manage some actual wargames. Is it too much to
ask?
That's a lot of armies! Or am I just the exception (5 armies spanning 3 conflicts)?
ReplyDeleteHow do you find the Baccus and Irregular in terms of size compatibility? Later Baccus are quite chunky compared to H&R and irregular.
It is rather a large number. I must have spent my formative years painting; no wonder I don't like it....
DeleteAnyway, yes. H&R are quite spindly compared to Baccus and Irregular. Baccus and Irregular are compatible if they are in different units, I find. The main problem with Irregular is that they tend to come with large quantities of flash from time to time. The main problem with Baccus is that I never managed to persuade Mr Berry to do Aztecs :)