I mentioned before that I had
made a bit of a return to the “renaissance” side of wargaming, and had started
to track down and re-base some toys to yield an Elizabethan army. As yet the
question of their enemy has been left unresolved. The English, in the time of
Elizabeth T., fought the Scots, French, Irish and Spanish, and allied with
Scots, French and Dutch. In anticipation of deciding on an enemy, I have
purchased supplies of plastic card for further adventures in basing.
The toy soldiers are quite old, Irregular
6 mm. I note that Irregular do still make them, which is gratifying in case I
need any reinforcements. On the other hand, I find that having a table 80 cm
square means that I no longer have to worry about increasing the sizes of my
armies. Twenty bases or so is the maximum I need.
The downside of this, of course,
is that while looking through my stocks of “renaissance” armies, I came across
some interesting forces. I discovered 16th Century Poles and
Muscovites, for example. Immediately my wargamer’s mind’s eye was away thinking
about sweeping cavalry moves. Fortunately the spasm passed, and I continued
with the job in hand, that of searching for a navy.
This is where the story gets a
little odd, or at least, where I start to show my considerable age. I had,
years ago, a number of “renaissance” (a horrid and inaccurate term, hence the
scare quotes) navies, from both the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. (There
you are, by the end of the seventeenth century the early Enlightenment was well
underway; renaissance it wasn’t). I also recall having said navies in various
scales, all of them fairly small.
The fact of the matter is that I
cannot find most of them. I have put them away somewhere safe, evidently. I
have searched in my cupboard and in the crates of deeper storage, but of
Armadas and seventeenth century Anglo-Dutch wars fleets there remains no sign.
I think I must be getting old.
Still, I did find some nice-ish
fleets which are next on my list of things to do. So far as I can identify
them, they are Hallmark 1:2400 scale galleys and galleons. And very nice they
are as well, it seems to me. I do not even seem to have painted them too badly.
A few have been dismasted during our last house move (which was over a decade
ago – I have been away from the “renaissance” for too long), but no serious
damage was noted on a cursory glance.
The Estimable Mrs P was
sympathetic (or, possibly, was humouring the old fool) and immediately offered
to buy some reinforcements for what I had found (now you know why she is the
Estimable Mrs P), but, rather to her surprise (and, in fact, to mine) I demurred,
saying I had better check what I had already. Fortunately, again, for me, they
seem still to be in production. I had better try to work out what they are
before splashing out and lumbering (yes, wooden ships) myself with more painting.
Anyway, I am not sure that you
really wish to hear about my struggles with memory and small ships. The
question which arises with the Elizabethan era, of course, is whether the
Armada could have succeeded. This is a tricky question, and something that is
surely worthy of a wargame or several. The problem is, where to start.
Initially, there is the Spanish
strategic dilemma. Phillip II of Spain was presented with two rather good plans
for invading England. One, by the Admiral, the Marquis of Santa-Cruz, envisaged
a direct assault by a fleet with an army on board launched from Spain. The
other, by the Duke of Parma, Phillip’s preeminent general, suggested a lightning
strike by the army of the Netherlands across the Channel. This, of course, gave
Phillip a dilemma. Which plan should he choose, and who would he upset by doing
so?
In the event, the plan was an
amalgam of the two. The Armada, with an army on board, would sail up the
Channel and escort Parma’s army across it. This did have the advantage of
providing protection for Parma’s troops on the crossing, and requiring a less
powerful army to be dispatched from Spain, and hence a smaller Armada. However,
it did require decent communication between the fleet and the army, which is
something that has often been notoriously difficult to establish, even with
modern communication networks. Secondly, of course, the Spanish immediately
lost the element of surprise which Parma’s plan envisaged.
Of course, we know how it turned
out. Parma could not board his troops and get them into the Channel in the time
the Armada was on station, and he had no inshore fighting craft to escort them
past the Dutch vessels anyway. Secondly, as with all invasions of Britain, the
Royal Navy only really had to remain in being to thwart it. The Armada was not
sent out to fight the English navy, nor was it equipped to. The defeat of the
English navy was not part of the plan. If Parma could get his men ashore, then
the navy would surrender along with the rest of the country.
So, even ignoring the English
land based resistance options, we have some interesting scenarios here. There is,
of course, the Armada as history records it. We could see if it does any better
than the original. But then as wargamers we have at least two counter-factual
scenarios, plus one where the two are combined but independent. This latter one
is intriguing. The English were not made of ships. If the Armada had assaulted,
say, Plymouth, it would have drawn a fair bit of the English navy to the
south-west, possibly leaving the way open for Parma to slip across and land in
Kent. I am not sure how this would have gone, but having the bulk of the
English army still in its home counties would be a positive boon in these
circumstances, I should think.
How about the term 'Early Modern' or is that too broad a sweep? Or if talking purely about the military history, Pike and Shot Era (setting aside it might not characterise all warfare of the period)? I suppose '16th/17th centuries' is probably the most accurate but it doesn't trip off the tongue.
ReplyDeleteAye, I've seen various wrangles about the name for the period. Eventually the email list was named 'Renaissance, Early Modern, Pike and Shot' or REMPAS for short. I suppose there is no good answer.
DeleteGrief, I'd rather have something 'a bit wrong' like Renaissance than REMPAS. Sounds like some sort of community services supplier.
DeleteThe current email list is called RenWars. The most recent post is about the Ottoman Wars in 1683. Maybe 'Ren' means something other than 'renaissance'?
DeleteBut there does not seem to be a good name for the period. Mostly 'early modern' is used, but that too is vague: 'Early modern wargaming' sounds like a morning game.
I have fond memories of my one brief foray into naval wargaming in my youth. IT was fostered by finding a few 1:1200 Armada ships in a shop. After buying all 4.... I expanded by buying "large galleys" in 1:1200 and using them for some form of small galley. Upon acquiring a copy of a set of WRG rules for 16thC combined ops I added some H&R 1:300 spanish and moors. (OK they didn't sell Moors so I "paint converted" various likely things).
ReplyDeleteThose things, I find, are a lot more fun than we get with doing it the 'right' way with the 'right' forces. Either we just enjoy the game better or sentimentalism is rife in my memory.
Delete